viernes, 20 de junio de 2008

United Front

United Front Filed under: Politik > Barack Obama > Hillary Clinton

wenn1743522.jpg

In an effort to unite the Democratic Party, Barack Obama's campaign announced today that he will be campaigning with Hillary Clinton next week.

Yay!!!!!

The two senators will campaign together starting next Friday, June 27th.

The pair will also meet in Washington with some of Clinton's top contributors in an effort to try and calm donors who are still bothered by Obama's presidential campaign.

Few details are being released at the moment, though.

The news did come one day after Obama announced that he would reverse an earlier position and reject almost $85 million in public financing for the general election.

The announcement was received with a lot of criticism.

So, to draw the attention elsewhere, he made the announcement a week early about campaigning with Hillary.

Do U think Obama should have Hillary run as Vice President

Busted. Again.

Filed under: Film Flickers > Busted! > Shia LaBeouf

shia.jpg

Oops!

Shia LaBeouf was caught smoking somewhere he shouldn't have been…again.

According to reports, Shia just couldn't quell his need for a cig while filming a Transformers 2 scene at the "no smoking allowed" Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C.

Shia reportedly set off a smoke detector alarm when he lit up in the men's room. Sources say he endured a stern lecture, topped by a warning he’d be ejected from the museum if he lit up again.

Give up the dirty habit already!



At Yahoo, the Exodus Continues


SAN FRANCISCO — For more than two years, executives and other senior employees have been leaving Yahoo at a steady, persistent trickle.

The trickle has turned into a flood. In a matter of days after Yahoo’s announcement last week that merger talks with Microsoft had ended and that the company had instead chosen to sign a search advertising partnership with its No. 1 rival, Google, three executive vice presidents, two senior vice presidents and handful of other well-regarded employees have announced their intention to leave.

The precipitous exodus is hollowing out Yahoo’s senior management ranks. It is also raising new questions about the future of the company and its top executives. Analysts say that the departures suggest that Jerry Yang, the chief executive, and Susan L. Decker, the president, are increasingly isolated.

“Wall Street has lost all confidence at this point,” said Ross Sandler, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets. “The senior managers have clearly lost confidence in the strategy and have lost confidence in Sue and Jerry, and that’s not a good thing.”

Scott Kessler, an equity analyst with Standard & Poor’s, said: “One of the reasons that Jerry was selected to be the C.E.O. is because he could get people excited about working for Yahoo again. Now people are taking a step back.”

Mr. Yang and Yahoo’s board are also under pressure from Carl C. Icahn, the activist investor, who is waging a fight for control of the company’s board. Although he has vowed to remove Mr. Yang if he succeeds, Mr. Icahn has said little about his plans since the Yahoo-Google deal was announced last week.

Yahoo insiders confirmed on Thursday that three more senior executives, Qi Lu, Brad Garlinghouse, and Vish Makhijani, are leaving the company. All were responsible for critical areas of Yahoo’s business.

Yahoo declined to confirm the departures. In a statement, the company said: “We have a deep and talented management team across all areas of the company.” It said that Yahoo is experiencing “the attrition that’s to be expected in the Internet industry.” Mr. Garlinghouse and Mr. Makhijani did not return calls or answer e-mail inquiries seeking comment. Mr. Lu could not be reached.

Among the newly departing executives, Mr. Garlinghouse is perhaps the best known outside of Yahoo. He is senior vice president for communications and communities, and is responsible for vital products like Yahoo’s e-mail and messaging services, Yahoo Groups and Flickr, the popular photo sharing site.

He gained wide notoriety when an internal memo he wrote was leaked to The Wall Street Journal in November 2006. The memo, which he named the Peanut Butter Manifesto, criticized Yahoo for spreading its resources too thinly across too many projects, as peanut butter is spread on toast.

Mr. Makhijani, who is senior vice president of Yahoo’s search group, is leaving to join Yandex, Russia’s leading search engine, the Yahoo insiders said.

On Monday, Jeff Weiner, who is executive vice president of Yahoo’s network division and Mr. Garlinghouse’s and Mr. Makhijani’s boss, announced that he was leaving to divide his time between two venture capital firms. Usama Fayyad, who is chief data officer and the executive vice president in charge of Yahoo’s research organization, also announced his departure this week.

The spate of departures leaves Yahoo’s network division, which is responsible for almost all of the Yahoo portal, without its top leader and two of his four deputies. Mr. Lu is executive vice president for the search and advertising technology group. He oversaw engineering efforts for the company’s search engine and search advertising technology.

The departures have also affected the ranks of senior engineers and managers. Last week, Jeremy D. Zawodny, who joined the company in 1999 and helped start its developer network, said he was leaving. This week, Caterina Fake and Stewart Butterfield, the husband-and-wife team who founded Flickr and sold it to Yahoo in 2005, also announced their departures.

“These were all talented, good people,” said Christa Quarles, an analyst with Thomas Weisel Partners.

The exodus comes as plans for a major reorganization are taking shape and could be announced as early as next week, according to the people with knowledge of the management departures. The reorganization is being pushed by Ms. Decker.

While the exact outline of the organizational changes is unclear, Hilary Schneider, a protégé of Ms. Decker who is executive vice president for global partner solutions, is expected to assume greater responsibilities, these people said.

A senior Yahoo executive said a reorganization “is the worse possible thing they would do at the moment. In a time of total instability, the last thing you want to do is make people nervous about their jobs.” He spoke on condition of anonymity because, although he was also considering options outside of Yahoo, speaking out could jeopardize his employment.

The departure of Mr. Lu was reported Thursday in the Web site AllThingsD. The departures of Mr. Garlinghouse and Mr. Makhijani were reported Thursday in the blog TechCrunch.

Meanwhile, Microsoft is making no secret that it sees the apparent disarray as an opportunity. In February, Microsoft’s chairman, Bill Gates, said that Yahoo’s talented engineers were among the reasons Microsoft was seeking to acquire the company. Now Microsoft is making new overtures to those engineers.

On Wednesday, the company took out a full-page ad in the San Jose Mercury News, whose distribution area includes Sunnyvale, where Yahoo is based, and other Silicon Valley cities, to recruit Internet search specialists at its valley campus

Ford Delays Pickup as Big Vehicle Slump Hurts Outlook


DEARBORN, Mich. — The Ford Motor Company said on Friday that it would delay introducing its new pickup truck and that it will probably lose money for a fourth consecutive year in 2009 because of the slowdown in demand for large vehicles.

Ford said it would begin selling the highly anticipated 2009 version of the F-150 pickup in late fall, two months later than intended, so that dealers would have more time to clear out the current model. In addition to the delay, the company said it would build 90,000 fewer trucks in the second half of the year than it had previously planned, while increasing production of cars and crossovers that are more fuel-efficient.

“As gasoline prices average more than $4 a gallon and consumers worry about the weak U.S. economy, we see June industry-wide auto sales slowing further and demand for large trucks and S.U.V.’s at one of the lowest levels in decades,” Ford’s chief executive, Alan R. Mulally, said in a statement. “Ford has taken decisive action to respond to this accelerating shift in customer demand away from large trucks and S.U.V.’s to smaller cars and crossovers, and we will continue to act swiftly moving forward.”

For the second time in a month, Ford issued a warning about next year’s financial results. “Unless the economy improves, it will be difficult for Ford to break even companywide on a pretax basis in 2009, excluding special items,” the statement said. In May, executives had abandoned Ford’s long-held goal of becoming profitable in 2009, predicting a break-even performance.

Company shares were down more than 7 percent in afternoon trading.

The automaker said the market had deteriorated to such a degree that its financing arm, Ford Motor Credit, which has been a dependable source of profit, would lose money this year.

Losses from automotive operations would be worse this year than in 2007, the statement said, the opposite of its previous guidance. Ford lost $2.7 billion overall in 2007 and has not earned a full-year profit since 2005.

Ford Credit will have a pre-tax loss — excluding any potential payment related to Ford’s profit maintenance agreement — primarily because of further weakness in large truck and S.U.V. auction values. Ford Credit is no longer is planning a distribution payment to Ford in 2008.

Shares of Ford fell nearly 6 percent, to $5.96 in morning trading.

The F-150 delay increases the likelihood that the F-series will lose its distinction as the best-selling vehicle in the United States after 31 consecutive years. In May, four Japanese sedans, led by the Honda Civic, outsold the F-series, the first time in 16 years that a pickup truck was not the top seller in any given month. Sales of the F-series fell 33 percent last month and are down 20 percent so far this year.

Ford has spent several years and hundreds of millions of dollars, if not billions, overhauling the F-150, which has generated huge profits and is responsible for a large part of Ford’s image. It is one of two new full-size pickups scheduled to go on sale this fall, along with Chrysler’s 2009 Dodge Ram.

Chrysler executives said they had no plans to delay the Ram’s launch.

“There’s no better way to fight a slower pickup market than to introduce what we think is a game-changing truck,” a Chrysler spokesman, Bryan Zvibleman, said.

General Motors announced earlier this month that it would close four truck plants in North America, and more recently has decided to pull back on plans to revamp its pickups and S.U.V.’s in order to focus attention on smaller cars.

Because of the precipitous drop in demand for trucks, Ford said it now expected total industry sales to be 14.7 million to 15.2 million vehicles, down from its previous projection of at least 15 million.

Analysts say the first three weeks of June have been particularly dismal, with J.D. Power and Associates estimating that sales are equal to an annualized rate of 12.5 million vehicles, the worst in at least 15 years.

In response, Ford is shutting its truck plant in Wayne, Mich., for nine weeks starting Monday, though the adjacent car plant, which builds the fast-selling Focus sedan, is adding a third shift and increasing the speed of its assembly line.

The company will eliminate a shift at each of the two plants that build the F-150, in Kansas City and Dearborn. The Dearborn plant will be idle for “most of the third quarter,” Ford said. Meanwhile, a sport-utility vehicle plant in Louisville will lose a shift in the third quarter.

In contrast, shifts will be added to a plant in Ontario that builds crossover vehicles and to the assembly line in Kansas City that builds Ford’s most fuel-efficient S.U.V.’s, including hybrid versions.

“We view the move to smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicles as permanent, and we are responding to customer demand,” Mr. Mulally said. “In the near term, we are adjusting production to the actual demand — increasing small cars and crossovers and reducing large trucks and S.U.V.’s. For the long term, we are moving fast to introduce more small cars, crossovers and fuel-efficient powertrains — including more hybrids.”

jueves, 19 de junio de 2008

Lights, Camera, Inaction

THE other day, my daughters brought out some old photos that made them feel so nostalgic they wanted to move on to the harder stuff: videos.

So I loaded up my personal favorite. “Ella Gets Plastered” is a two-minute clip from a long-ago birthday party where the guests made facemasks so ugly that even Freddy Krueger wouldn’t wear them.

It has some great moments, especially the part where the plaster dries faster than anyone expected and gives some guests accidental eyebrow waxes. It also happens to be the only surviving family video that we have.

Once there were others, of course. As far back as 1989, I got a terrible backache from carrying around the pack of unwieldy, heavy equipment necessary to make a riveting 10-minute thriller called “Baby Zoe Takes a Bath.” But we don’t own a VCR anymore to play it.

In 1992, I bought an expensive camcorder to shoot “Frosting Face” to document Ella’s first birthday. That tape broke. And in 1998, my husband made a desktop video clip called “The Walker” on the day Clementine took her first steps. Then the hard drive died.

Years went by without pictures. It became too hard to be the family archivist in an age of ever-changing technology, especially for someone like me who fears any gadget more complicated than a cocktail shaker. Every time I tried, a battery died or a memory card went missing or I pushed the wrong button or accidentally taped over someone’s piano recital.

“So this is all you have to show for nearly two decades of raising children?” asked my oldest daughter, Zoe, pointing accusingly at the final wrenching face-peel scene in “Ella Gets Plastered.”

She got good at guilt at college. So last week I decided to try to redeem myself — and strike a blow for long-suffering, technically challenged family archivists everywhere — by testing the tiny, new Flip Video Mino camera ($179), whose greatest virtue is that with no buttons to push, its bare-bones touch screen barely does anything (beyond a little light zooming).

“That’s what makes it fun,” said Jonathan Kaplan, the chief executive of Pure Digital Technologies, the company that makes the Mino.

Fun? I suppose Mr. Kaplan should know, having already sold nearly a million units of an earlier, bulkier generation of Flip Video camcorders released last year. He added that another big selling point is that you can easily upload the videos to the Internet — a medium one hopes won’t become obsolete as quickly as, say, Betamax — to store them at sites like YouTube or, in my case, Facebook.

Still, I was skeptical. My guess is that amateurs have been feeling guilty about the pictures they missed ever since the mid-1800s, when the Englishman who was an inventor of photography, William Henry Fox Talbot, put his own family in front of a camera and yelled “cheese.”

On the other hand, my offspring would probably enjoy the process more than Mr. Talbot’s did, the historian Douglas R. Nickel said when I phoned him to describe the pressure I was under to make videos. “In the 19th century, they had to pose for uncomfortably long periods of time. In bright sunshine. Outside,” said Dr. Nickel, the Andrea V. Rosenthal Professor of Modern Art at Brown University. “You had to hold that pose. It was torturous.”

I had to admit that the shiny black Mino review unit Mr. Kaplan lent to me last week didn’t look like it would torture anyone. It was adorable, in fact. Smaller and thinner than some decks of cards I’ve owned, it had no buttons, no memory card (it has 2 gigabytes of built-in memory) and required no AA batteries (it automatically recharged when plugged into a computer).

After I took it out of its case, it took about 10 seconds to figure out where to press the touch screen to start making memories.

“Today, we’re going to watch someone we all know play online poker,” I said into the microphone as I aimed the Mino toward my husband and zoomed in on his computer screen. “Honey, can you tell the camera how much you’ve won?”

“Turn that thing off,” my husband snapped.

“Be glad you don’t have to hold the pose in bright sunshine for several minutes,” I pleaded. “Help me make memories.”

“Here’s a memory,” he said, forcing me to yell “cut” before he could strike a pose that would have shocked the Talbots.

Next, I plugged the Mino directly into the back of my Mac (no ugly cords, just a metal coupler thing). While I installed the simple editing software, my 10-year-old daughter, Clementine, came into the room.

As we watched the 20-second episode of “The Poker Player’s Revenge,” I felt a terrible wave of nostalgia, as sadness and longing for a lost time overcame me.

“I miss those days,” I said.

“It happened five minutes ago,” Clementine said.

“Look how young your father looks,” I said.

Clementine picked up the Mino, examined it briefly and said, “That’s because you forgot to peel the plastic off the lens.”

Most Doctors Aren’t Using Electronic Health Records

A government-sponsored survey of the use of computerized patient records by doctors points to two seemingly contradictory conclusions, and a health care system at odds with itself.

The report, published online on Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine, found that doctors who use electronic health records say overwhelmingly that such records have helped improve the quality and timeliness of care. Yet fewer than one in five of the nation’s doctors has started using such records.

Bringing patient records into the computer age, experts say, is crucial to improving care, reducing errors and containing costs in the American health care system. The slow adoption of the technology is mainly economic. Most doctors in private practice, especially those in small practices, lack the financial incentive to invest in computerized records.

The national survey found that electronic records were used in less than 9 percent of small offices with one to three doctors, where nearly half of the country’s doctors practice medicine.

Dr. Paul Feldan, one of three doctors in a primary care practice in Mount Laurel, N.J., considered investing in electronic health records, and decided against it. The initial cost of upgrading the office’s personal computers, buying new software and obtaining technical support to make the shift would be $15,000 to $20,000 a doctor, he estimated. Then, during the time-consuming conversion from paper to computer records, the practice would be able to see far fewer patients, perhaps doubling the cost.

“Certainly, the idea of electronic records is terrific,” Dr. Feldan said. “But if we don’t see patients, we don’t get paid. The economics of it just seem so daunting.”

Private and government insurers and hospitals can save money as a result of less paper handling, lower administration expenses and fewer unnecessary lab tests when they are connected to electronic health records in doctors’ offices. Still, it is mainly doctors who bear the burden making the initial investment.

“We have a broken market for electronic health record adoption because the people who gain financially are not the people who pay,” said Dr. Blackford Middleton, a health technology expert at Partners Healthcare, a nonprofit medical group that includes Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston.

To fix the market, Dr. Middleton, like others, recommends that the government play a role in providing incentives or subsidies to speed the use of computerized patient records in the United States, whose adoption rate trails most developed nations.

The government took a step in that direction last week, announcing a $150 million Medicare project that will offer doctors incentives to move from paper to electronic patient records. The program is intended to help up to 1,200 small practices in 12 cities and states make the conversion.

Individual doctors will be offered up to $58,000 over the five-year span of the project, which is intended to test the impact of incentives on the spread of electronic health records. Further programs across the country are planned.

The report published in the journal also found that electronic health records were used by 51 percent of larger practices, with 50 or more doctors.

Indeed, electronic health records are pervasive in the largest integrated medical groups like Kaiser Permanente, the Mayo Clinic, the Cleveland Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and others. These integrated groups not only have deep pockets. By combining doctors, clinics, hospitals and often some insurance they can also capture the financial savings from electronic health records.

The findings of the study, which was paid for by the Department of Health and Human Services and a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, broadly echo previous research on the adoption of electronic health records. Large medical groups have long been the early adopters, and small practices have struggled.

But the new study is based on a large sampling — more than 2,600 doctors across the country — and a detailed survey, making it more definitive than past research, experts say. The results, they say, also show a strong endorsement of electronic health records by doctors who have them, especially for what the report termed “fully functional” records, which include reminders of care guidelines, based on a patient’s age, gender or medical history.

For example, 82 percent of those using such electronic records said they improved the quality of clinical decisions, 86 percent said they helped in avoiding medication errors and 85 percent said they improved the delivery of preventative care.

“Those numbers are huge and very encouraging,” said Dr. David J. Brailer, the former health information technology coordinator in the Bush administration.

Dr. Brailer also pointed to the 54 percent of doctors without electronic health records who said that not finding an electronic health record that met their needs was a “major barrier” to adoption. In short, they are not satisfied with the existing products, which tend to be designed for hospitals — big customers — instead of small practices.

“What we see is a deficit in innovation, and that is something innovators and the capital markets can address,” said Dr. Brailer, who leads a firm that invests in medical ventures, Health Evolution Partners.

One wave of innovation is coming from big technology companies, like Microsoft and Google, which recently have begun services that offer consumer-controlled personal health records over the Web, which are stored in the companies’ data centers. These consumer-controlled health records are intended to link up and exchange information with electronic patient records in doctors’ offices and hospitals.

Dr. Peter Masucci, a pediatrician with his own office in Everett, Mass., embraced electronic health records to “try to get our practice into the 21st century.”

He could not afford conventional software, and chose a Web-based service from Athenahealth, a company supplying online financial and electronic health record services to doctors’ offices.

Dr. Masucci was already using Athenahealth’s outsourced financial service, and less than two years ago adopted the online medical record.

Today, Dr. Masucci is an enthusiast, talking about the wealth of patient information, drug interaction warnings and guidelines for care, all in the Web-based records.

“Do I see more patients because of this technology? Probably no,” Dr. Masucci said. “But I am doing a better job with the patients I am seeing. It almost forces you to be a better doctor.”

Obama Forgoes Public Funds in First for Major Candidate

WASHINGTON — Senator Barack Obama announced on Thursday that he would not participate in the public financing system for presidential campaigns. He argued that the system had collapsed, and would put him at a disadvantage running against Senator John McCain, his likely Republican opponent.

With his decision, Mr. Obama became the first candidate of a major party to decline public financing — and the spending limits that go with it — since the system was created in 1976, after the Watergate scandals.

Mr. Obama made his announcement in a video message sent to supporters and posted on the Internet. While it was not a surprise — his aides have been hinting that he would take this step for two months — it represented a turnabout from his strong earlier suggestion that he would join the system. Mr. McCain has been a champion of public financing of campaign throughout his career.

“The public financing of presidential elections as it exists today is broken, and we face opponents who’ve become masters at gaming this broken system,” he said. “John McCain’s campaign and the Republican National Committee are fueled by contributions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs. And we’ve already seen that he’s not going to stop the smears and attacks from his allies running so-called 527 groups, who will spend millions and millions of dollars in unlimited donations.”

Mr. Obama had pledged to meet with Mr. McCain following the primaries to attempt to work out an agreement on financing. That meeting never took place, aides to Mr. Obama said, because a meeting between lawyers for the two sides was not fruitful. “It became clear to me that there wasn’t any basis for future discussion,” said Robert Bauer, the general counsel for Mr. Obama’s campaign.

Told on Thursday morning of Mr. Obama’s decision to opt out of public financing, Charlie Black, a senior adviser to Mr. McCain, charged that Mr. Obama had “broken his word.” Mr. Black reacted to the news after a reporter showed him the Obama campaign’s statement on a Blackberry in the lobby of the Chicago hotel where the McCain campaign was staying.

Jill Hazelbaker, the McCain campaign’s communications director, said later on a conference call with reporters: “The true test of a candidate for President is whether he will stand on principle and keep his word to the American people. Barack Obama has failed that test today, and his reversal of his promise to participate in the public finance system undermines his call for a new type of politics.” She added, “This decision will have far-reaching and extraordinary consequences that will weaken and undermine the public financing system.”

In fact, Mr. Obama stopped short of making a flat promise to participate in the public financing system. Asked in a questionnaire whether he would take part if his opponents did the same, Mr. Obama wrote yes. But he added, “If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.”

Mr. Obama has since said that he would only agree to such a deal if Mr. McCain agreed to curtail spending by the Republican Party and independent groups.

Mr. Obama’s campaign has been notable this year for its success in raising money; he outstripped his Democratic opponents in the primary and seemed well-positioned to out-raise Mr. McCain.

Under the federal presidential financing system, a candidate this year would be given $84.1 million from the Treasury to finance a general election campaign. In exchange, the candidate is barred from accepting private donations, or from spending more than the $84.1 million.

All indications this year are that Mr. Obama will have no problem raising more than that amount for the general election; he raised $95 million in February and March alone, most of it, as his aides noted Thursday, in small contributions raised on the Internet. More than 90 percent of the campaign’s contributions were for $100 or less, said Robert Gibbs, the communications director to Mr. Obama.

That said, the Republican National Committee — which does not operate under the same contribution limits as the candidates — has proved to be much more successful than the Democratic National Committee in raising funds.

Mr. Black said that the McCain campaign’s fundraising was improving, and that its efforts to raise money in conjunction with the Republican National Committee and several state parties working to elect Mr. McCain — which allows donors to contribute far more than the $2,300 limit that they can give to presidential campaigns alone — was yielding results.

“I assume he’s going to outspend us,” Mr. Black said of Mr. Obama, but he added that the money advantage would prove to be less important than it appeared: “We don’t have to spend as much as he does to win.” he said.

For his part, Mr. Obama portrayed the decision to opt out of public financing as one that would limit the influence of special interests in the campaign.

“Instead of forcing us to rely on millions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs, you’ve fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20, whatever you can afford,” he told his supporters in the video message. “And because you did, we’ve built a grassroots movement of over 1.5 million Americans.”

miércoles, 18 de junio de 2008

Michelle Obama Looks for a New Introduction


Michelle Obama’s eyes flicker tentatively even as she offers a trained smile. As her campaign plane arcs over the Flathead Range in Montana, she is asked to consider her complicated public image.

Conservative columnists accuse her of being unpatriotic and say she simmers with undigested racial anger. A blogger who supported Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton circulates unfounded claims that Mrs. Obama gave an accusatory speech in her church about the sins of “whitey.” Mrs. Obama shakes her head.

Trademark Registration in Argentina

“You are amazed sometimes at how deep the lies can be,” she says in an interview. Referring to a character in a 1970s sitcom, she adds: “I mean, ‘whitey’? That’s something that George Jefferson would say. Anyone who says that doesn’t know me. They don’t know the life I’ve lived. They don’t know anything about me.”

Now her husband’s presidential campaign is giving her image a subtle makeover, with a new speech in the works to emphasize her humble roots and a tough new chief of staff. On Wednesday, Mrs. Obama will do a guest turn on “The View,” the daytime talk show on ABC, with an eye toward softening her reputation.

Her problems seemed hard to imagine last fall and winter. Mrs. Obama, a Harvard-trained lawyer, appeared so at ease with the tactile business of campaigning and drew praise for humanizing, often with humor, a husband who could seem elusive.

Then came some rhetorical stumbles. In Madison, Wis., in February, she told voters that hope was sweeping America, adding, “For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country.” Cable news programs replayed those 15 words in an endless loop of outrage.

Barack Obama often blurs identity lines; much of his candidacy has seemed almost post-racial. Mrs. Obama’s identity is less mutable. She is a descendant of slaves and a product of Chicago’s historically black South Side. She burns hot where he banks cool, and that too can make her an inviting proxy for attack.

Fox News called her “Obama’s baby mama,” a derogatory term for an unwed mother. Christopher Hitchens, a Slate columnist, claimed — with scant evidence — that her college thesis proved she was once influenced by black separatism. National Review presented her as a scowling “Mrs. Grievance.”

The caricatures of Mrs. Obama as the Angry Black Woman confound her, friends say. Her own family crosses racial boundaries — her mother-in-law and a sister-in-law are white — and she has spent much of her adult life trying to address racial resentment.

In her freshman year at Princeton, a white roommate’s mother agitated for her daughter to swap rooms. Mrs. Obama was among a handful of blacks at a prestigious Chicago law firm. As a hospital executive, she navigated the often tense line between a predominantly white-run institution and a suspicious black community.

But the 44-year-old woman known even to friends as The Taskmaster sometimes speaks with a passion unusual for a potential first lady. She tells voters that “Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual — uninvolved, uninformed.”

Trademark Registration in Argentina

She says she intends to evoke a John F. Kennedy-like idealism and highlight her own journey, but in her commanding cadences, some people — and not just conservatives — hear a lecture.

Before her husband announced his candidacy, Mrs. Obama confided in friends: Barack and I will cut an unfamiliar figure to most of America.

“It’s such uncharted waters,” said Verna Williams, a Harvard classmate and friend. “In a sound-bite era, where you have to come with a quick and dirty take, she doesn’t fit what it means to be an African-American woman.”

Michelle Robinson grew up in the black half of a divided Chicago. She and her brother, Craig, lived with their parents on the second floor of a bungalow. “Two bedrooms, if you want to be generous,” she says.

Her father, Frasier Robinson, was a pump operator for Chicago’s water department and a precinct captain in the Democratic machine. Her mother, Marian, brought workbooks home to keep her children ahead of their classes. The working-class neighborhood was filled with uncles and grandparents, block associations and oak trees. “We knew the gang-bangers — my brother played basketball in the park,” Mrs. Obama says. “Home never feels dangerous.”

In 1981, she left for Princeton, an overwhelmingly white institution that cherished its genteel traditions. She was one of 94 black freshmen in a class of over 1,100. Catherine Donnelly, a white student from New Orleans, was a roommate. Her mother spent months pleading with Princeton officials to give her daughter a white roommate instead. “Mom just blew a gasket when I described Michelle,” Ms. Donnelly recalled. “It was my secret shame.”

Mrs. Obama shrugs now. Some classmates resented blacks; some resented affirmative action. “Diversity can’t be taken care of with 10 kids,” she says. “There is an isolation that comes with that.”

Her brother, two years older, was a star basketball player at Princeton, but he felt similarly. “If you’re young and black and from the South Side, there are always going to be people who feel you should not be there,” Craig Robinson said. “You build up a thick skin.”

Black and white students rarely socialized. When Crystal Nix Hines became the first black editor of the student newspaper, The Daily Princetonian, some black students wondered why she wanted to run a “white” newspaper. Mrs. Obama, however, was thrilled that a historic barrier had fallen.

That did not stop her, however, from confronting Ms. Hines, a friend, over an article that contained what Mrs. Obama took to be inappropriate characterizations of a black politician. “ ‘You need to make sure that a story like that doesn’t run again,’ ” Ms. Hines recalls her friend saying with utter calm.

Sociology became her lens to examine her anxieties about race. Mrs. Obama spent hours in the office of Professor Marvin Bressler. “She was troubled by the questions that troubled every student in that situation,” he said. “They all walk around saying, ‘Who am I?’ ”

In her senior thesis, she asked: Does immersion in an elite white institution draw blacks away from their community? She surveyed black Princeton alumni, finding their ties weakened after graduation.

“The path I have chosen to follow by attending Princeton,” Mrs. Obama wrote in the introduction, “will likely lead to my further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society, never becoming a full participant.”

Mitchell Duneier, a sociology professor at Princeton who reviews undergraduate theses, noted that Mrs. Obama rejected some of her own theories. “Her senior thesis is being misread as if it is a polemical essay about her alienation,” Professor Duneier said.

Epiphany Leads to Home

Michelle Obama recalls gazing out the window of her plush 47th-floor office in downtown Chicago and realizing that she could barely see, literally or metaphorically, her beloved South Side.

After graduating from Harvard Law School in 1988, Mrs. Obama took a job at what is now Sidley Austin, a corporate law firm. She had a handsome salary and the prospect of better to come.

Then a close friend from college died. So did her father, who had long suffered from multiple sclerosis; Michelle so adored him that she would curl up in his lap even as an adult.

“I looked out at my neighborhood and sort of had an epiphany that I had to bring my skills to bear in the place that made me,” she says in the interview. “I wanted to have a career motivated by passion and not just money.”

Eventually, she started the Chicago chapter of a training program called Public Allies. One day, looking for young leaders, she might knock on doors at Cabrini-Green, a public housing project so violent and neglected it would later be mostly demolished. Another day, she discovered Jose A. Rico, a young Mexican so alienated that he insisted on remaining an illegal immigrant rather than pursue citizenship. What is your goal? he recalled her asking.

Trademark Registration in Argentina

To open a high school for Latinos, he replied. Mrs. Obama nodded: Good, tell me exactly how you would do it.

“Michelle was tough, man; she let nothing slide,” said Mr. Rico, now principal of Multicultural Arts High School in Chicago, which he helped start.

She preached the gospel of the second and third chance, insisting that the white youth from Swarthmore work alongside the former gang member.